On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:39:13AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > I noticed that this was applied to for-6.1. I know you do not rebase or > change your trees so this request might be rejected based on that alone > but would it be possible to cherry-pick this to for-6.0 so that it can > be applied to Linus's tree quicker? We have had to apply this change to > our CI to keep our builds green in mainline, -tip, and 5.19/5.15 stable > with clang-16 due to -Werror. If not, no worries, I should have made it > clearer that is what I was looking for with the subject prefix. Hrm, OK - it's a bit surprising that this didn't get fixed in -next before the clang change made it to mainline TBH, it looked like something that had just hit -next.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
