On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 08:45:51AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:44:33PM +1000, Matt Flax wrote: > > On 17/8/22 04:00, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > In the final commit, there is a 'break' here. Should it be a 'return 0' > > > instead? Or should there be a different fix for these warnings? > > The state of DIR PLL registers aren't important if the user doesn't specify > > a known mclk frequency. The implication is that the DIR will not function, > > however that is already implied by the user lacking to specify a known mclk > > frequency. > > The other functions on the chip (port A/B I2S, SRC, DIT, etc) will behave as > > per usual, only the DIR will be dysfunctional. > So I suppose there is little point to all of the calls to regmap_write() > and regmap_update_bits() in the default case then, meaning a 'return 0' > would be appropriate? Sorry, I am having a hard time parsing what should > be done about the warnings, which are fatal for allmodconfig due to > CONFIG_WERROR. Are either of you still looking at fixing this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature