On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Martin Povišer wrote: > > On 22. 8. 2022, at 15:04, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 02:38:09PM +0200, Martin Povišer wrote: > >> simply having a ‘graph.dot’ at hand, especially since it requires > >> little code. (Although sure there’s the danger of it growing.) > > I'm also worried about people going in and wanting other more tool > > specific formats adding, if we didn't have anything at all it'd be one > > thing but we do have something. > Sure, although I would argue DOT is by a large margin the standard > format to represent graphs in. Well, the debugfs stuff there is more a general tool for introspecting the current DAPM state than it is indended to draw a pretty picture. When I wrote it the scale of the devices I was working with was such that I'm not usre a full graph would've been terribly useful, and there's even larger devices since then (though also a lot of systems like yours which do use very much smaller devices).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
