On 19/08/2022 15:58, Martin Povišer wrote: > >> On 19. 8. 2022, at 14:54, Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Add binding schema for MCA I2S transceiver found on Apple M1 and other >> chips. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/sound/apple,mca.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/apple,mca.yaml >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/apple,mca.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/apple,mca.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..7b4f348c2be3 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/apple,mca.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ > > >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + items: >> + - enum: >> + - apple,t8103-mca >> + - apple,t6000-mca > > Since it was brought up last time but I didn’t respond: the > nonalphabetical order is as the chips were introduced (and > matches other schemas). Sure, just keep that order for future compatibles as well - so always put them according to verifiable time of market introduction... This is very poor reason, instead of alphabetical order. Even worse reason is repeating wrong pattern just because someone else did it. Best regards, Krzysztof
