On 2022-08-16 11:59 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:15:44 +0200,
Cezary Rojewski wrote:
...
Cezary Rojewski (6):
ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Introduce HDA codec init and exit routines
ASoC: SOF: Intel: Introduce HDA codec init and exit routines
ASoC: Intel: Drop hdac_ext usage for codec device creation
ALSA: hda: Always free codec on the device release
ALSA: hda: Remove codec init and exit routines
ALSA: hda: Fix page fault in snd_hda_codec_shutdown()
I've received a message yesterday that patches: 1/6, 3/6 and 6/6 were
not delivered to recipient: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. None else is
listed there. lore.kernel.org also shows only four letters (3 +
cover-letter) rather than seven. Given Mark's Ack on patch 3/6 it
makes me believe that indeed just the alsa-devel did not received some
of the messages.
What should I do in such situation? Is the server admin about to
Meant to say 'able' instead of 'about'.
"recover them from the void" or should I resend the entire series as:
"[RESEND PATCH v2]" as see how it goes this time?
I guess the full resubmission would be better.
Should I apply Mark's ACKs for patches 2/6 and 3/6 in the
about-to-be-resent series?
