On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 02:25:14 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote: > Fixed ACPI dependency complie errors and warnings as listed below. > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:34:1: error: redefinition of 'snd_soc_acpi_find_machine' > 34 | snd_soc_acpi_find_machine(struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *machines) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:9: > include/sound/soc-acpi.h:38:1: note: previous definition of > 'snd_soc_acpi_find_machine' > with type 'struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *(struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *)' > 38 | snd_soc_acpi_find_machine(struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *machines) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > sound/soc/soc-acpi.c: In function 'snd_soc_acpi_find_package': > sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function > 'acpi_fetch_acpi_dev'; > did you mean 'device_match_acpi_dev'? > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 58 | struct acpi_device *adev = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | device_match_acpi_dev > >> sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:58:36: warning: initialization of > 'struct acpi_device *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer > without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > sound/soc/soc-acpi.c:64:25: error: invalid use of undefined type > 'struct acpi_device' > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: amd: fix ACPI dependency compile errors and warnings commit: ab34403db24233e603338b70deb9a84093c88397 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
