>>> +static int wsa883x_update_status(struct sdw_slave *slave,
>>> + enum sdw_slave_status status)
>>> +{
>>> + struct wsa883x_priv *wsa883x = dev_get_drvdata(&slave->dev);
>>> +
>>> + if (status == SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED && slave->dev_num > 0)
>>
>> do you actually need to test if slave->dev_num is > 0?
>>
> Few years back I think it was you who asked me to add this check.. :-)
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg2073074.html
Oops!
My comment was valid in general but at the bus level. With the benefit
of hindsight, I don't think this comment is valid in this callback.
update_status is either called with UNATTACHED, or with ATTACHED/ALERT
after programming dev_num to a value > 0.
It's not wrong to leave the code as is, but it's likely to be an
always-true condition.
