Thanks Mark, On 29/06/2022 11:58, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:06:43AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:+static int wsa_dev_mode_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol) +{ + struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol); + struct wsa883x_priv *wsa883x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); + + if (wsa883x->dev_mode == ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]) + return 0; + + wsa883x->dev_mode = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]; + + return 0; +}This isn't returning 1 when the value changes so will miss generating events, please test the driver with mixer-test.
Yes my bad..
+ switch (event) { + case SND_SOC_DAPM_POST_PMU: + if (wsa883x->dev_mode == RECEIVER) { + snd_soc_component_write_field(component, WSA883X_CDC_PATH_MODE, + WSA883X_RXD_MODE_MASK, + WSA883X_RXD_MODE_HIFI); + snd_soc_component_write_field(component, WSA883X_SPKR_PWM_CLK_CTL, + WSA883X_SPKR_PWM_FREQ_SEL_MASK, + WSA883X_SPKR_PWM_FREQ_F600KHZ); + snd_soc_component_write_field(component, WSA883X_DRE_CTL_0, + WSA883X_DRE_PROG_DELAY_MASK, 0x0); + } else if (wsa883x->dev_mode == SPEAKER) {This looks like it'd be better written as a switch statement.
Sounds good,
+static const struct snd_kcontrol_new wsa883x_snd_controls[] = { + SOC_SINGLE_RANGE_TLV("PA Gain", WSA883X_DRE_CTL_1, 1, + 0x0, 0x1f, 1, pa_gain),Volume controls should end in Volume, mixer-test should also have caught this.
Okay, will fix all these in next spin.
