On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:36:04 +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2022, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > But it's a marginal difference, so for your version: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > OK, could you throw the patch to CI for verification? > > > I can merge it for the next pull request (probably in this week) once > > > after confirmation. > > > > sure thing, I'll confirm later this week. > > tests are clean for the patch so > > Tested-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Did a bit of analysis why this was not caught in testing earlier. IVB (and > older) systems are covered in the intel-gfx CI, but it turns out PCI class > is 0300 (VGA compatible adapter) on all of these. But alas on the > reporter's system, PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_OTHER was used, so the problem is > definitely there and the fix is needed. Great, thanks for the update. I submitted the proper patch now. Takashi
