On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 16:16:16 -0700 Bill Wendling <morbo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 4:03 PM Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday 2022-06-10 00:49, Bill Wendling wrote: > > >On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:25 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 22:16:19 +0000 Bill Wendling <morbo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> > This patch set fixes some clang warnings when -Wformat is enabled. > > >> > > >> tldr: > > >> > > >> - printk(msg); > > >> + printk("%s", msg); > > >> > > >> Otherwise these changes are a > > >> useless consumer of runtime resources. > > > > > >Calling a "printf" style function is already insanely expensive. > > >[...] > > >The "printk" and similar functions all have the "__printf" attribute. > > >I don't know of a modification to that attribute which can turn off > > >this type of check. > > > > Perhaps you can split vprintk_store in the middle (after the call to > > vsnprintf), and offer the second half as a function of its own (e.g. > > "puts"). Then the tldr could be > > > > - printk(msg); > > + puts(msg); > > That might be a nice compromise. Andrew, what do you think? > Sure. It's surprising that we don't already have a puts().