On 17-05-08 12:45, Stas Sergeev wrote: >> No objections against your patch, but considering that virtually >> everyone has EXPERIMENTAL enabled in his kernel it won't bring >> you out of any troubles... > So do you think it should depend > on CONFIG_BROKEN? No, I wouldn't do that. It isn't all that broken it would seem (assuming it will work for me after applying the patch you posted that should make it work with older alsa-lib; haven't checked yet). > The other possibilities, like hardcoding > the index value as Andreas Mohr suggested, > are also interesting. Can someone please > comment if this is acceptable? Generally I'd say totally unacceptable but this might in fact be a special case due to it being generic PC hardware and expected to be present therefore -- it might actually make some sense to reserve a #define SND_INDEX_PCSP MAXINT or some such so that this thing gets a stable index (and make sure people know to select it through its name like in "default:pcsp" and the like). I'd ask Takashi for comment on that... Rene. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
