Hello Mark, On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 03:29:48PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 04:12:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On some platforms (i.e. arc, m68k and sparc) __fls returns an int (while > > on most platforms it returns an unsigned long). This triggers a format > > warning on these few platforms as the driver uses %ld to print a warning. > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patches or serieses, this > makes it harder for both people and tools to understand what is going > on - it can bury things in mailboxes and make it difficult to keep track > of what current patches are, both for the new patches and the old ones. The motivation to do that is that the thread for a patch that broke something is the canonical place to look if someone already reported (or even fixed) the problem before. That b4 seems to fail to extract the patch is indeed unfortunate. For a MUA I'd expect that it sorts threads after the last received mail, so that part is only a matter of a sane mail reader configuration. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
