From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit ad685980469b9f9b99d4d6ea05f4cb8f57cb2234 ] DAPM tracks and reports the value presented to the user from DAPM controls separately to the register value, these may diverge during initialisation or when an autodisable control is in use. When writing DAPM controls we currently report that a change has occurred if either the DAPM value or the value stored in the register has changed, meaning that if the two are out of sync we may appear to report a spurious event to userspace. Since we use this folded in value for nothing other than the value reported to userspace simply drop the folding in of the register change. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428161833.3690050-1-broonie@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c index 417732bdf286..f2f7f2dde93c 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c @@ -3427,7 +3427,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_volsw(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, update.val = val; card->update = &update; } - change |= reg_change; ret = soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(card, kcontrol, connect, rconnect); @@ -3529,7 +3528,6 @@ int snd_soc_dapm_put_enum_double(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, update.val = val; card->update = &update; } - change |= reg_change; ret = soc_dapm_mux_update_power(card, kcontrol, item[0], e); -- 2.35.1
