Hi Pierre-Louis
> @@ -522,6 +578,14 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link
*sof_card_dai_links_create(struct device *dev,
> goto devm_err;
> }
> break;
> + case LINK_BT:
> + ret = create_bt_offload_dai_links(dev, links, cpus,
&id, ssp_bt);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "fail to create bt offload dai
links, ret %d\n",
> + ret);
For this point, we just follow Intel member to write for this coding style.
The other component also was the same style.
> > @@ -384,6 +384,14 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach
> snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
> > .sof_fw_filename = "sof-adl.ri",
> > .sof_tplg_filename = "sof-adl-cs35l41.tplg",
> > },
> > + {
> > + .id = "10134242",
> > + .drv_name = "adl_mx98360a_cs4242",
> > + .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
> > + .quirk_data = &adl_max98360a_amp,
> > + .sof_fw_filename = "sof-adl.ri",
>
> This also was the same style with others.
>
> > + .sof_tplg_filename = "sof-adl-max98360a-rt5682.tplg",
>
> Why would you refer to a topology that uses a different codec?
>
Because Intel college use the same naming style for the same audio codec.
