Re: [PATCH 01/38] ASoC: soc-component: Add comment for the endianness flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Charles,

On 5/9/22 10:37 AM, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Kirill Marinushkin wrote:
In the [PATCH 00/38] of this patch set, you write:
2) Devices behind non-audio buses, SPI just moves bits and doesn't
really define an endian for audio data on the bus. Thus it seems the
CODEC probably can care about the endian. The only devices that fall
into this group (mostly for AoV) are: rt5514-spi.c, rt5677-spi.c,
cros_ec_codec.c (only the AoV).
 From my experience with some PCM codecs by TI, they can not care about the
endianness. For example, in driver [1], if I allow BE format as
well, and configure
the sound card to use BE, it will not work. I have no sound with BE.
In these cases, the codec HW supports *only* LE. That's why their
`snd_soc_dai_driver`
structures provide only LE in the `format` field.
If such drivers specify `endianness = 1`, then `soc-core` will
extend their supported
formats with BE counter-parts, see [2]. AFAIU, it will have the same
effect, as if the
drivers themselves provided their formats in both LE | BE.

I don't think adding `endianness = 1` to such codecs will work as expected.
Unfortunately, I don't have an easy access to HW today, to confirm
or disprove
this understanding.

This sounds like an error on the CPU side of the DAI link rather
than the CODEC side of the DAI link. The formats that will be
supported on the link are the union of the CPU and CODEC supported
formats, ie. a format must be supported on both for the DAI to
support it.


Yes, agree, both sides of the DAI link should provide only endianness they support.

This works currently, but, from my understending, it will break, after we set `endianness = 1`.

As soon as we start setting `endianness = 1`, the function `convert_endianness_formats()` will extend LE to (LE | BE), right?

If so, setting `endianness = 1` is the source of an error, right?


I could be missing something. Let's see what other reviewers think.


The CPU I2S hardware should be sending out the bits in the same
order regardless of if the data you feed it is BE or LE, as I2S
specifies an ordering for the bits.


What does the endianness in the driver configure, then?


If this is not the case then
the host I2S controller is claiming to support an endian it does
not, and the problem should be fixed on that side by removing the
supported endian.


I think we have a misundersanding of my example.

In my example, i don't mean, that my CPU part of the DAI link is broken.

What i tried to demonstrate - is that if i set the unsupported endianness, i wouldn't expect that "the CODEC probably can care about the endian", as the message in [PATCH 00/38] suggests. I would expect, that i will have no sound.


Best regards,

Kirill


Thanks,
Charles



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux