At Thu, 08 May 2008 07:53:11 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:22 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > This is a mmap of the data record to be shared in realtime with apps. > > > The app updates its data pointer (appl_ptr) on the mmapped buffer > > > while the driver updates the data (e.g. DMA position, called hwptr) on > > > the fly on the mmapped record. Due to its real-time nature, it has to > > > be coherent -- at least, it was a problem on ARM. > > > > This doesn't sound like a coherency problem to me, and least not one you'd find > > on PowerPC. Both the driver and the application run on the host CPU, so there > > shouldn't be any coherency problem. My understanding is that a "non coherent" > > platform is one where the host CPU isn't aware when a *hardware device* writes > > directly to memory, e.g. via DMA. > > Yes, precisely. I was about to make a reply here. There is some > confusion at least in terminology, in Alsa. This is not DMA coherency, > though it is a problem with virtually tagged data caches that some archs > such as ARM have. Right. The words should be corrected. Since the only way to get a certain non-cached map was the (ab-)use of dma_mmap_coherent(), such a confusing wording was chosen. > So this is ok for all PowerPC since they all have a physically tagged > data cache. OK, so that part should work as is for PPC. > The real problem -is- still the DMA coherency issue and as I see it, is > two fold: > > - mmap'ing of the result of dma_alloc_coherent() doesn't work. There > are two issues at play here, one is the pgprot that -must- be set to > uncached for such a mapping on non coherent architectures (and non > coherent architectures only), and the other is our virt_to_page() that > will puke on virtual addresses coming from dma_alloc_coherent(). And dma_mmap_coherent() would be a solution for it, I suppose. > - mmap'ing of SG lists for non coherent DMA. There the problem is a > mixture of how Alsa allocate the SG buffers mixes with the previous > problem. Yes. > I think it's never valid to create an SG list with the output of > dma_alloc_coherent though. We would need a dma_alloc_sg() for that... > > sglists are made of pages, thus allocated with GFP, and later DMA mapped > with dma_map_*, however this brings a whole other set of issues/constra > ints such as bouce bufferring on some MMU less platforms if the memory > happens to come out of the wrong place. Also, such mapped buffers are > -not- coherent as they must not be modified via their virtual address > while mapped, -unless- they are also mapped in kernel and/or user space > (vmap & mmap) using some kind of "coherent" attributes such as > pgprot_noncached. (and provided that is possible at all in kernel place > for archs like MIPS). > > I don't have an easy answer there, it seems the bogosity roots deep in > alsa, at least for the SG bits. For the non-SG bits, we can probably > work around with an accessor to get the right pgprot and maybe some > variant of virt_to_page() (dma_virt_to_page() ?) that would walk the > kernel page tables to obtain the pfn. The vmap() in sound/core/sgbuf.c can be omitted by adding proper PCM callbacks (copy and silent) to handle SG-buffers. These are only guys that access the linear buffer runtime->area. Then we'll just need a proepr mmap PCM callback just calling dma_mmap_coherent() for each SG page. Also, the default PCM mmap should be fixed to use dma_mmap_coherent() appropriately. That's all. So, what we really need is dma_mmap_coherent() implementations... thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel