On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:07:39PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 17:03 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > After seeing the code, I am starting to wonder if the reuse is
> > overkill. If
> > they (RT5682 vs. RT5682S) only have some minor differences, probably
> > it could
> > reuse more by:
> >
> > SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(i2s8, ...
> > SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(i2s9, ...
> >
> > ...
> >
> > if (card == &mt8192_mt6359_rt1015p_rt5682s_card) {
> > i2s8_codecs.name = RT5682S_DEV0_NAME;
> > i2s8_codecs.dai_name = RT5682S_CODEC_DAI;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Or even uses of_device_is_compatible() if it would like to reuse the
> > struct
> > snd_soc_card.
> If we reuse the struct snd_soc_card, the card .name will be same.
> Should I change the card .name through of_device_is_compatible()?
Exactly yes.
