On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:18:32PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 01/03/2022 17:06:37+0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote: > > As the potential failure of the clk_enable(), > > it should be better to check it and return error if fals. > As I already replied to an earlier patch, this will never, ever fail, > this patch doesn't fix anything. OTOH it doesn't do too much harm to have the error checking and it means people don't have to check if this is a case where it doesn't matter.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
