On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:38:08PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
Again, mostly looks good just some minor issues (I've not repeated some
that applied to the prior code):
> +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new mtk_hw_gain2_in_ch1_mix[] = {
> + SOC_DAPM_SINGLE_AUTODISABLE("ADDA_UL_CH1", AFE_CONN15,
> + I_ADDA_UL_CH1, 1, 0),
> +};
These end up as regular user visible controls so should have standard
control names - in this case ending in Switch since it's a simple
on/off. A similar issue was there in the earlier patches.
> +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new mtk_hw_gain_controls[] = {
> + SOC_SINGLE("HW Gain 1", AFE_GAIN1_CON1,
> + GAIN1_TARGET_SFT, GAIN1_TARGET_MASK, 0),
> + SOC_SINGLE("HW Gain 2", AFE_GAIN2_CON1,
> + GAIN2_TARGET_SFT, GAIN2_TARGET_MASK, 0),
These should have standard names like "HW 1 Volume" so userspace has a
better idea how to display them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
