On 17-04-08 22:39, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
[ John: I never drop CCs unrequested as I really dislike it when people do
that in a conversation I myself am reading but please say so if you don't
care to be in this thread ]
> Rene Herman wrote:
>> On 16-04-08 17:19, Rene Herman wrote:
>>
>> For now last time that I reply to myself (promise):
>>
>>> On 16-04-08 16:29, Rene Herman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 15-04-08 16:33, Rene Herman wrote:
>>
>>>> On that note, I just acquired an Audigy 2 (SB0240) that I'm testing
>>>> with and now that I'm paying attention to it due to this thread --
>>>> its 0 dB setting is very significantly louder (with everything
>>>> behind the line-out constant ofcourse) than the 0 dB setting on my
>>>> TerraTec DMX.
>>>>
>>>> James, I believe you are the emu10k1 person? Data:
>>>>
>>>> TerraTec DMX = ESS Canyon3D (ES1970MS-3D) + Sigmatel STAC9704T
>>>>
>>>> Creative Audigy 2 (SB0240) = Creative CA0102-ICT + Sigmatel
>>>> STAC9721T (+ Crystal CS4382-KQ which seems to provide digital
>>>> attenuation as well)
>>>>
>>>> At 0 dB master the Audigy 2 is much louder than the DMX is and
>>>> audibly distorts. Judging by hearing, keeping the master at -16 dB
>>>> (60 in the integer scale) gets things about the same. Was that scale
>>>> provided by datasheet or just guessed? Especially the distortion
>>>> would seem to indicate that something is actually doing analogue
>>>> amplification at the 0 dB ALSA setting...
>>>
>>> Expanding, with the 'Line' control at 0 dB (74 integer) and 'Analog
>>> Mix' at 0 dB (100 integer) everything does sound right with both
>>> 'Master Capture' and 'Master' at full, and too faint with 'Master'
>>> at -16 dB. I guess this indicates that it's something at the DSP side
>>> only? (sort of loosing my way in this bewildering array of controls
>>> so if I need to be guided to possibly say sensible things -- please do)
>>
>> When I do actually capture, -16 dB master is again the correct setting
>> when playing back (with everything else still set to 0 dB as described
>> above). It's then equally load as when directly monitored during
>> recording. I expect then the Master dB scale needs to be adjusted
>> down? If yes, I'll try to make very, very sure that -16 dB now is the
>> correct new 0 dB.
>
> Can we narrow this down a bit please.
> Run speaker-test -c2 -twav
> Do the test to each sound card with alsamixer set to 0dB for most
> controls accept the master, and leave the master at a sensible setting
> for your setup so that you can hear sound at a sensible level
> With the same dB values on the Andigy 2 and DMX, do you get the same
> loudness of sound output to the speakers?
Very much not. Sorry, it seems the report (unsnipped above) got a little
confusing due to the followups but with everything at 0 dB on both DMX and
Audigy 2, the Audigy 2 is much louder and distorts.
DMX has 'PCM' -34.5 --> +12 dB and 'Master' -46.5 --> 0 dB. I always keep
both at 0 dB for a good, comfortable level (adjusted further externally).
Audigy 2 'Front' and 'Wave' are both at 0 dB (max) (everything default in
fact) and with 'Master' at 0 dB, it's much louder then the DMX. Setting
'Master' to -16 dB (60) gets things the same.
> I would like to find out if the problem is in the playback path, or the
> capture path.
Playback I'd say and I personally consider DMX right here, due to the
distortion from the Audigy.
Only introduced capture into the story above as "additional evidence" where
I could do a a comparison using only the Audigy itself and not the DMX: with
everything at 0 dB in the capture direction, a captured file needs to be
played back at -16 dB 'Master' to be equally loud to what I hear _during_
capturing as well ("hear" from 'Analog Mix' at 0 dB). So I get the feeling
it's a simple matter of transposing 0 dB on the Master scale for the Audigy
(ie, new 0 dB is old -16 dB).
I should have another emu10k1 driven card here somewhere. Is it useful if I
try to dig it up and see if the story's the same on it?
Rene.
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
