On 11/26/21 8:09 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:41:38PM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > >> Sorry for my late response. >> (It was PC replace week) > > No worries, hope the new PC is working well! > >>>> I would think it's more accurate to update the delay information while >>>> dealing with the hw_ptr update, no? > >>> Morimoto-san? > >> I think your opinion is very correct. >> But this patch-set is for "cleanup/refactoring", >> and your opinion is for "add new feature", I think. > > Hrm, right - this isn't making anything better or worse in terms of the > accuracy, it's just moving things around so Pierre's suggestion is a > separate thing. Indeed, I misunderstood the series are removing the update of the runtime->delay field while updating the hw_ptr, but this is only shuffling code around. This is still updating both avail/delay in the same manner so no objections. Sorry for the noise.
