On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:00:54 +0100 "ext Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 01:45:30PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > > So what I mean that should I post the patch like as it now, rebased > > to dev branch of linux-2.6-asoc tree and with some minor changes, > > or wait a bit when all linux-omap and ASoC v2 evolve? What you > > think? > > Whatever is most convenient for you. From the point of view of > getting stuff in immediately it's best to base things on ASoC v1 > though from an ongoing development point of view ASoC v2 is a better > target if you can cope with any churn and hopefully we should be > starting to push it into the kernel within the next couple of release > cycles so if it's going to take a while to get the required BSP > changes in... > I'll think I have to go for both :-) The first ASoC v1 based version I would mostly like to see as an enabler for getting n different ALSA implementation we have in linux-omap tree to be ported for ASoC. Especially codec drivers. Or to have an another DAI link driver for EAC (Enhanced Audio Controller) found in OMAP2420. The v2 I see also as mandatory path. We already do have boards with multiple DAI links and codecs: e.g. audio codec + audio link to bluetooth chip. I'll simplify a bit my patch, base it to alsa-dev and post it here soon. -- Jarkko _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
