On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:59:25 -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > Sparse, make W=1 and cppcheck all report minor warnings. > > The only functional change is in patch7 where the error code is now > returned to the caller. > > Pierre-Louis Bossart (8): > ASoC: topology: handle endianness warning > ASoC: rt5682s: use 'static' qualifier > ASoC: nau8821: fix kernel-doc > ASoC: nau8821: clarify out-of-bounds check > ASoC: mediatek: remove unnecessary initialization > ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: rename shadowed array > ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: fix return value > ASoC: rockchip: i2s_tdm: improve return value handling > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/8] ASoC: topology: handle endianness warning commit: 1baad7dad115ea3976fb5e5d0e3f3bec83dfd7ca [2/8] ASoC: rt5682s: use 'static' qualifier commit: 49ba5e936e1512d4c7812d433048f8909234fca0 [3/8] ASoC: nau8821: fix kernel-doc commit: 765e08bdc7faa44b13bf96df4663a580d68a1c49 [4/8] ASoC: nau8821: clarify out-of-bounds check commit: 46ae0b3f554a323322a770c0edee50aa8019a655 [5/8] ASoC: mediatek: remove unnecessary initialization commit: 33fb790fcc02a717c1cac90958f203f06da14f7e [6/8] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: rename shadowed array commit: 73983ad922764e747d40b486ec7c2526e0355db1 [7/8] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: fix return value commit: 439c06f341aa1f09ad7def774998db1076946c98 [8/8] ASoC: rockchip: i2s_tdm: improve return value handling commit: f913582190ddfe2380ecf8ee87b4ff2c8dcb5d48 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark