On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 12:36:27PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > a bit unsure if regulator_bulk_force_disable() is indeed the right > function here, its documentation specifies a different usecase. > My motivation for this change was to make it obvious in > cs42l51_i2c_remove() that there is no error to handle to eventually make > i2c remove callbacks return void, too. It would be better to just ignore the errors on disable. Realistically you'd have to really be trying to trigger an error here and it's most likely that the system is in enough trouble if one is triggered that it's just not worrying about. I'm not sure how likely it is that anyone would ever remove one of these devices in production though.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
