On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 4:16 PM Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 04:42:04PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > Well for little endian either would work (because adj is 0 :) but yes > > there are 3 such paddings before the second member on big endian, so > > it should be 3. > > How about this? It avoids open coding the logic and handles it as 2 > 4-byte substructures with endian-specific offsets. Looks good to me. Arnd