Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Unify HDAudio-ext bus initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Cezary Rojewski wrote:

> HDAudio-extended bus initialization parts are scattered throughout Intel
> ADSP drivers code. Gather them up in snd_hda_ext_bus_init() to provide
> unified initialization point.
[...]
> --- a/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_bus.c
> +++ b/sound/hda/ext/hdac_ext_bus.c
[..]
> -int snd_hdac_ext_bus_init(struct hdac_bus *bus, struct device *dev,
> -			const struct hdac_bus_ops *ops,
> -			const struct hdac_ext_bus_ops *ext_ops)
> +int snd_hda_ext_bus_init(struct hda_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +			 const struct hdac_bus_ops *ops,
> +			 const struct hdac_ext_bus_ops *ext_ops,
> +			 const char *model)
[...]
> -	bus->idx = 0;
> -	bus->cmd_dma_state = true;
> +	base->idx = 0;
> +	base->cmd_dma_state = true;
> +	base->use_posbuf = 1;
> +	base->bdl_pos_adj = 0;
> +	base->sync_write = 1;
> +	bus->pci = pdev;
> +	bus->modelname = model;
> +	bus->mixer_assigned = -1;
> +	mutex_init(&bus->prepare_mutex);

hmm. It's not clear whether we should initialize the regular hdac_bus 
fields in the ext_bus_init(). For plain HDA, these are also initialized
in the caller. E.g. in sound/pci/hda/hda_controller.c.

So if we start cleaning up, should we go further put this in 
snd_hdac_bus_init()? 

Then another is what is the right place for settings like "sync_write = 
1". While this settings applies to all current users of the extended
bus, this is really hw specific setting and not really a property of 
the extended bus, so this feels a bit out-of-place.

Br, Kai



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux