Re: [PATCH 3/3] ASoC: Intel: sof_rt5682: use id_alt to enumerate rt5682s

[Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 11:43 AM Pierre-Louis Bossart
<pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/6/21 1:34 PM, Curtis Malainey wrote:
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static struct snd_soc_acpi_codecs adl_rt5682s_hp = {
> >> +       .num_codecs = 1,
> >> +       .codecs = {"RTL5682"}
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>  struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
> >>         {
> >>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> >> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
> >>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98373_rt5682",
> >>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
> >>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98373_amp,
> >> @@ -296,6 +302,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
> >>         },
> >>         {
> >>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> >> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
> >>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98357_rt5682",
> >>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
> >>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98357a_amp,
> >> @@ -304,6 +311,7 @@ struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
> >>         },
> >>         {
> >>                 .id = "10EC5682",
> >> +               .id_alt = &adl_rt5682s_hp,
> >>                 .drv_name = "adl_mx98360_rt5682",
> >>                 .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
> >>                 .quirk_data = &adl_max98360a_amp,
> >
> > Is there any way we can collapse this and the primary id into a single
> > list to avoid having 2 locations to track for the IDs?
>
> I was thinking about that too, but in that case we would want to have a
> list of strings, rather than the address of a structure which adds one
> layer of indirection.
>
> Something like
>
> .id = { "10EC5682", "RTL5682" }
>
> and the .num_codecs removed and some termination added.
>

I don't see an issue with still using a struct since we are using the
same list across multiple machines, but this makes me wonder if maybe
we should refactor this into another layer, having the ids at a top
structure and then the speaker matches a layer down. E.g.

 struct snd_soc_acpi_mach snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines[] = {
        {
                .drv_name = "adl_mx98373_rt5682",
                .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
                .quirk_data = &adl_max98373_amp,
        },
        {
                .drv_name = "adl_mx98357_rt5682",
                .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
                .quirk_data = &adl_max98357a_amp,
        },
        {
                .drv_name = "adl_mx98360_rt5682",
                .machine_quirk = snd_soc_acpi_codec_list,
                .quirk_data = &adl_max98360a_amp,
        }
}

struct machine_driver adl_rt5682_driver_match {
  .id = { "10EC5682", "RTL5682" }
  .instances = &adl_rt5682_machines
}