Hi Mark Thank you for your reply > > + multi: > > + description: Multi-CPU/Codec node > > + dpcm: > > + description: DPCM node > > + codec2codec: > > + description: Codec to Codec node > > I think I need to have another look through this sometime next week but > other than the naming thing discussed in the other subthread I think the > only issues I see at a high level are the standard concern about putting > DPCM into an ABI which I think we're stuck with having to do right now, > and also if we can merge multi and CODEC-CODEC links more. There's bits > you've called out in your changelog as needing further work but I think > it's OK to add things incrementally. > > Overall it's looking pretty good, thanks for working on this. Thank you. I'm looking forward to your detail review, and happy to create v4 Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
