Hi Bixuan,
Thanks for catching that.
I found there are other usages of of_parse_phandle() in the file.
Will you handle them together?
If not, I will prepare a patch to fix them after this patch is merged.
Thanks,
Trevor
On Sat, 2021-09-11 at 16:12 +0800, Bixuan Cui wrote:
> The platform_node is returned by of_parse_phandle() should have
> of_node_put() before return.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Bixuan Cui <cuibixuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
> b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
> index c97ace7387b4..8cd8450409e8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359-rt1019-rt5682.c
> @@ -1041,8 +1041,10 @@ static int
> mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!priv)
> + if (!priv) {
> + of_node_put(platform_node);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> snd_soc_card_set_drvdata(card, priv);
>
> @@ -1050,6 +1052,8 @@ static int
> mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s snd_soc_register_card fail
> %d\n",
> __func__, ret);
> +
> + of_node_put(platform_node);
> return ret;
> }
>
