On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 11:39 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 8/27/21 4:24 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20210826: > > > > The kbuild tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a > > commit. > > > > The uml tree gained a conflict against the asm-generic tree. > > > > The net-next tree still had its build failure for which I applied a > > patch and it also gained a semantic conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > The bpf-next tree lost its build failure. > > > > The tip tree gained conflicts against the arm64 tree. > > > > The ftrace tree gained a conflict against the uml tree. > > > > The vfio tree gained conflicts against the drm tree. > > > > The kspp tree still had its build failure so I used the version > > from > > next-20210825. > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 9867 > > 9528 files changed, 552507 insertions(+), 227054 deletions(-) > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------- > > > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > > (patches at > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1Elrd3C7VsM3veH53cUbQL6aJZ-wvxXFQPfv49y4jkBaC_NYoz65Fd1XDWUYNuUemg$ > > ). If you > > are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git > > pull" > > to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with > > the > > old one. You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the > > new > > master. > > > > You can see which trees have been included by looking in the > > Next/Trees > > file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log > > files in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was > > built > > with a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a > > multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf. After > > the final fixups (if any), I do an x86_64 modules_install followed > > by > > builds for x86_64 allnoconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit), > > ppc44x_defconfig, allyesconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, > > sparc > > and sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs. And finally, a simple boot test > > of the powerpc pseries_le_defconfig kernel in qemu (with and > > without > > kvm enabled). > > > > Below is a summary of the state of the merge. > > > > I am currently merging 334 trees (counting Linus' and 90 trees of > > bug > > fix patches pending for the current merge release). > > > > Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1Elrd3C7VsM3veH53cUbQL6aJZ-wvxXFQPfv49y4jkBaC_NYoz65Fd1XDWUMIEk3KA$ > > A$ . > > > > Status of my local build tests will be at > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!1Elrd3C7VsM3veH53cUbQL6aJZ-wvxXFQPfv49y4jkBaC_NYoz65Fd1XDWWTlM0ZzA$ > > . If maintainers want to give > > advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open > > to add > > more builds. > > > > Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds. And to > > Paul > > Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes. > > > > on i386: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_SOC_MT6359 > Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && !UML && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && > MTK_PMIC_WRAP [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - SND_SOC_MT8195_MT6359_RT1019_RT5682 [=y] && SOUND [=y] && !UML > && SND [=y] && SND_SOC [=y] && I2C [=y] && SND_SOC_MT8195 [=y] > > > caused by 40d605df0a7b: ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add machine driver > with mt6359, rt1019 and rt5682 > > Full randconfig file is attached. > Hi Randy, I will add a dependency to avoid that. Thanks, Trevor
