From: Mark Brown,,, <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:25:01 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The first 2 patches are sraightforward and look logical to me.
>
> However, the 3rd one in purely speculative. It is based on the fact that a
> comment states that we enable some irqs on some slave ports. That said, it writes
> 0xFF in some registers.
>
> So, I guess that we should disable these irqs when the driver is removed. That
> said, writing 0x00 at the same place looks logical to me.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] ASoC: wcd9335: Fix a double irq free in the remove function
commit: 7a6a723e98aa45f393e6add18f7309dfffa1b0e2
[2/3] ASoC: wcd9335: Fix a memory leak in the error handling path of the probe function
commit: fc6fc81caa63900cef9ebb8b2e365c3ed5a9effb
[3/3] ASoC: wcd9335: Disable irq on slave ports in the remove function
commit: d3efd26af2e044ff2b48d38bb871630282d77e60
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown,,, <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
