On 14/08/2021 23:19, Aakash Hemadri wrote:
> Prefer `of_device_get_match_data` over `of_match_device`
>
> Retrieve OF match data using `of_device_get_match_data`, this is cleaner
> and better expresses intent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aakash Hemadri <aakashhemadri123@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
> index b043a0070d20..bf13f3d25cec 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/ti/davinci-evm.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int davinci_evm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct clk *mclk;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_evm_dt_ids), &pdev->dev);
> + match = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
incorrect,
of_device_get_match_data() is retrieving the match->data
> if (!match) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error: No device match found\n");
> return -ENODEV;
>
--
Péter
