Hi Mark, Rob Thank you for your feedback > > for example, > > test-cpu : silent Component, silent DAI > > test-cpu-vn : verbose Component, silent DAI > > test-cpu-nv : silent Component, verbose DAI > > test-cpu-vv : verbose Component, verbose DAI > > Should these be runtime rather than binding options? Or at least > properties rather than something that's part of the compatible. It > doesn't feel right to have flags like that in the compatible at any > rate, and if we're making fixed DTs for test purposes (eg, to run in > qemu as part of a testsuite) it's no more difficult to use properties. > > I'm not sure if Rob has thoughts on the base concept of such virtual for > test bindings but they do seem like something that might be useful. I'm assuming that "verbose" version will be used for test/debug purpose, and it is needed for boot-time too. Thus, switching it runtime is unfortunately not good. I'm OK to use flag property for it if DT rule/maintainer was OK. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
