On 7/5/21 11:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:28:28PM +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
>
>> @@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ struct snd_soc_card {
>> unsigned int disable_route_checks:1;
>> unsigned int probed:1;
>> unsigned int component_chaining:1;
>> + unsigned int dai_reorder:1;
>
> This feels like it should be a per dai_link option rather than a card
> wide option - the system could have a mix of links that do and don't
> want this depending on why it's an issue. The name probably also wants
> to be more specific to what's being reordered, something like
> stop_dma_first for example since it's only for stops and moves the DMA
> first.
>
As per our understanding by going with card wide option is easier rather
than checking dai link name for re-ordering the stop sequence for
specific platforms.
We will rename the flag as "stop_dma_fist" and will post the new version.
