Hi Takashi,
This patch seems legitimate to me (although I would adjust whitespace
so the second line doesn't go over 80 chars). Do you want to just
apply it as-is, or do you want me to send a second version of my patch
without this problem or send a new patch similar to this one?
Also sorry I don't know what the etiquette is in cc's for this message
:(. The message from kernel test robot was sent to a lot of people who
I don't think would be interested in this, so I trimmed the cc list
down.
Thanks,
Geoffrey.
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 02:09:00AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c:2000:5: warning: symbol 'snd_scarlett_gen2_controls_create' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: 265d1a90e4fb ("ALSA: usb-audio: scarlett2: Improve driver startup messages")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mixer_scarlett_gen2.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c b/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c
> index 3ad8f61a2095f..4caf379d5b991 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_scarlett_gen2.c
> @@ -1997,8 +1997,8 @@ static int scarlett2_mixer_status_create(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer)
> return usb_submit_urb(mixer->urb, GFP_KERNEL);
> }
>
> -int snd_scarlett_gen2_controls_create(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer,
> - const struct scarlett2_device_info *info)
> +static int snd_scarlett_gen2_controls_create(struct usb_mixer_interface *mixer,
> + const struct scarlett2_device_info *info)
> {
> int err;
>
