I was under the impression that the ASoc v1 ties the codec to a specific machine, and that v2 eliminates that need. Is that a correct assumption? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Brian Austin <brian.austin@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Cirrus Logic CS42L52 Low power codec Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:36:55 +0000 On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 08:17:53AM -0600, Brian Austin wrote: > I have a codec I would like to submit. The Cirrus Logic CS42L52 Low > Power codec. I have the codec code as well as the machine code for the > Cirrus Logic EP9407A, but cannot submit that yet. Is it OK to just > submit the codec code for now? This does not use the new API, so a hint > as to which tree to make the diff from would help. Assuming that this is an ASoC codec driver please go ahead and submit the codec by itself - there's no requirement for an in-tree machine driver. For ASoC v1 a patch against any of current alsa-driver hg, Linus' current kernel or the dev branch of the ASoC repository at git://opensource.wolfsonmicro.com/linux-2.6-asoc should be fine - whichever you find most convenient. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel