Em Qua, 31 de mar de 2021 23:19, Lucas <jaffa225man@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Thanks for the encouragement and wisdom. I hope your additions, and mine, > work out in the end. > They will! A real hurdle with tasking everyone with patching for their devices, aside > from having probably long since given up hope for use of the device on > GNU/Linux, is the amount of disparate forums they voiced their issues on. > There's also the daunting likelihood that select few music creators > actually would decide to compile their own kernels to see if a problem is > fixed, let alone feel comfortable enough applying a patch. > Recompiling kernels with custom patches and workarounds for regular devices is madness. This should be needed only for development purposes. > I hadn't realized this was a list to drum up testers, or that every change > needs to be tested fully. I thought it was a direct path to possible > acceptance for inclusion in the kernel, if reasonable doubts are considered. > Well the Linux kernel has to be somewhat orderly even if the open source development model is inherently chaotic. This should be a list with lots of testers but I'll bet the volume scares them off. > I hope they'll let me sidestep that huge, unreasonable, undertaking, as my > test implicit feedback "fix" for the UA-4FX (which doesn't need it) proved > it still functions as perfectly as without it. > I disagree a bit with you. It's not very wise to add unneeded quirks. That should mean that for the devices that don't require this patch, but > which had been accidentally added, no harm is done. I can't really see > myself as owner of all these devices someday... ;) > > Thanks again, Geraldo!, > > Lucas Endres > Thank you, Geraldo Nascimento >
