Dne 25. 03. 21 v 9:19 Yuan, Perry napsal(a):
> Hi Jaroslav:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 10:38 PM
>> To: Yuan, Perry; Mark Brown; pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> Limonciello, Mario; hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: pobrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oder_chiou@xxxxxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxxx;
>> mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx; alsa-devel@alsa-
>> project.org; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-
>> x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ASoC: rt715:add micmute led state control
>> supports
>>
>>
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>>
>> Dne 22. 03. 21 v 10:25 Yuan, Perry napsal(a):
>>> Hi Mark:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 1:24 AM
>>>> To: Yuan, Perry
>>>> Cc: pobrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>> oder_chiou@xxxxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; tiwai@xxxxxxxx;
>>>> hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Limonciello, Mario;
>>>> lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx; alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ASoC: rt715:add micmute led state control
>>>> supports
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 05:38:34PM +0800, Perry Yuan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + /* Micmute LED state changed by muted/unmute switch */
>>>>> + if (mc->invert) {
>>>>> + if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] || ucontrol-
>>>>> value.integer.value[1]) {
>>>>> + micmute_led = LED_OFF;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + micmute_led = LED_ON;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + ledtrig_audio_set(LED_AUDIO_MICMUTE, micmute_led);
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> These conditionals on inversion seem weird and counterintuitive. If
>>>> we're going with this approach it would probably be clearer to define
>>>> a custom operation for the affected controls that wraps the standard
>>>> one and adds the LED setting rather than keying off invert like this.
>>>
>>> Currently the sof soundwire driver has no generic led control yet.
>>> This patch can handle the led control needs for MIC mute LED, definitely
>> the patch is a short term solution.
>>> There is a feature request discussion when we started to implement this
>> solution.
>>> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2496#issuecomment-
>> 713892
>>> 620
>>>
>>> The workable way for now is that we put the LED mute control to the
>> codec driver.
>>> When there is new and full sound LED solution implemented, this part
>> will be also optimized.
>>> The Hardware privacy feature needs this patch to handle the Mic mute
>> led state change.
>>> Before that full solution ready in kernel, could we take this as short term
>> solution?
>>
>> Perry, it's about the machine detection. Your code is too much generic even
>> for the top-level LED trigger implementation. We need an extra check, if the
>> proper LED's are really controlled on the specific hardware. Other hardware
>> may use RT715 for a different purpose. Use DMI / ACPI checks to detect this
>> hardware and don't misuse the inversion flag to enable this code.
>>
>> Jaroslav
>>
>> --
>> Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
>> Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
>
> In the V2 patch, I have added the machine detection, but some guys thought that I should remove the detection for it is harmless to other system
> So I remove it in the following patches.
>
> Is it Ok for you if I add below detection of Dell system which enable the privacy feature ?
>
> Then the mute led control will be called normally and Mic mute will be successfully configured.
> There is no any impaction to other systems.
>
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DELL_PRIVACY)
> .....
> +#endif
I think that you misunderstood the request. It's about the runtime detection
not about the compile time detection. An example for DMI check is in
sound/soc/intel/boards/sof_sdw.c / sof_sdw_quirk_table .
Jaroslav
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
