[PATCH 10/14] ASoC: soc-pcm: indicate error message at dpcm_fe/be_dai_prepare()

[Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Indicating error message when failed case is very useful for debuging.
In many case, its style is like below.

	int function(...)
	{
		...
		return ret;
	}

	int caller(...)
	{
		...
		ret = function(...);
		if (ret < 0)
			dev_err(...)
		...
	}

This is not so bad, but in this style *each caller* needs to indicate
duplicate same error message, and some caller is forgetting to do it.
And caller can't indicate detail function() error information.

If function() indicates error message, we can get same and
detail information without forgot.

	int function(...)
	{
		...
		if (ret < 0)
			dev_err(...)

		return ret;
	}

	int caller(...)
	{
		...
		ret = function(...);
		...
	}

This patch follow above style at dpcm_fe/be_dai_prepare()

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index e141d0658279..4a01a3925ab6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2261,6 +2261,10 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_prepare(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, int stream)
 
 		be->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_PREPARE;
 	}
+
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: %s() failed (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2298,6 +2302,9 @@ static int dpcm_fe_dai_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
 	dpcm_set_fe_update_state(fe, stream, SND_SOC_DPCM_UPDATE_NO);
 	mutex_unlock(&fe->card->mutex);
 
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(fe->dev, "ASoC: %s() failed (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1