Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: skl-topology: fix -frame-larger-than

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:08 AM Nick Desaulniers
<nick.desaulniers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fixes:
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c:3613:13: warning: stack frame
> size of 1304 bytes in function 'skl_tplg_complete'
> [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> struct snd_ctl_elem_value is 1224 bytes in my configuration.
>
> Heap allocate it, then free it within the current frame.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes V1 -> V2: rebased on mainline.
>
>  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> index b824086203b9..566d07b4b523 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c
> @@ -3613,10 +3613,15 @@ static int skl_manifest_load(struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt, int index,
>  static void skl_tplg_complete(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>  {
>         struct snd_soc_dobj *dobj;
> -       struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *mach =
> -               dev_get_platdata(component->card->dev);
> +       struct snd_soc_acpi_mach *mach;
> +       struct snd_ctl_elem_value *val;
>         int i;
>
> +       val = kzalloc(sizeof(*val), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!val)
> +               return;
> +
> +       mach = dev_get_platdata(component->card->dev);
>         list_for_each_entry(dobj, &component->dobj_list, list) {
>                 struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol = dobj->control.kcontrol;
>                 struct soc_enum *se;
> @@ -3632,14 +3637,13 @@ static void skl_tplg_complete(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>                 sprintf(chan_text, "c%d", mach->mach_params.dmic_num);
>
>                 for (i = 0; i < se->items; i++) {
> -                       struct snd_ctl_elem_value val = {};


Shouldn't you use rather kmalloc() + memset(). Otherwise I don't see
how possible this won't be garbage on the second iteration of the
outer loop.

> -
>                         if (strstr(texts[i], chan_text)) {
> -                               val.value.enumerated.item[0] = i;
> -                               kcontrol->put(kcontrol, &val);
> +                               val->value.enumerated.item[0] = i;
> +                               kcontrol->put(kcontrol, val);
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
> +       kfree(val);
>  }
>
>  static struct snd_soc_tplg_ops skl_tplg_ops  = {
>
> base-commit: 88fe49249c99de14e543c632a46248d85411ab9e
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux