At Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:59:24 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 03:06:44PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > BTW: Does anyone know if it's possible to just pick a patch from a HG > > branch to another? STG (Stacked GIT) has nice 'stg pick <branch>@<patch>' > > command for this. > > hg update -C dest-branch > hg transplant -b source-branch revision > > But I must say that using branches in hg is rather painful. We tried > it for a while at my workplace and switched to using cloned repos for > branches (mostly). We had several instances of bad things happening > because of the way hg handled branches, and when those things got > pushed it was often very difficult to get the repo back to a decent > state. In my opinion git handles branches much better than hg does. Fair enough. I prpoposed HG branch because I have no way to create new repos by myself. The branch doesn't require a repo creation. But, an individual repo is of course a safer and well-checked solution. Probably it's same to git, too, although git seems to be able to handle branches better (and easier to repair trees). Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
