soundwire-controller@3210000 {
reg = <0 0x3210000 0 0x2000>;
compatible = "qcom,soundwire-v1.5.1";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 298 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
clocks = <&rxmacro>;
clock-names = "iface";
qcom,clock-stop-mode0;
qcom,din-ports = <0>;
qcom,dout-ports = <5>;
qcom,ports-sinterval-low = /bits/ 8 <0x03 0x1F 0x1F 0x07 0x00>;
qcom,ports-offset1 = /bits/ 8 <0x00 0x00 0x0B 0x01 0x00>;
qcom,ports-offset2 = /bits/ 8 <0x00 0x00 0x0B 0x00 0x00>;
qcom,ports-hstart = /bits/ 8 <0xFF 0x03 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF>;
qcom,ports-hstop = /bits/ 8 <0xFF 0x06 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF>;
qcom,ports-word-length = /bits/ 8 <0x01 0x07 0x04 0xFF 0xFF>;
qcom,ports-block-pack-mode = /bits/ 8 <0xFF 0x00 0x01 0xFF 0xFF>;
qcom,ports-lane-control = /bits/ 8 <0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00>;
qcom,ports-block-group-count = /bits/ 8 <0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0x00>;
#sound-dai-cells = <1>;
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <0>;
};
properties that may or may not be valid. If this is intentional and
desired, this should still be captured somehow, e.g. in the bindings
documentation or in the code with a comment, no?
Yes, I agree with you on this, I should document this in bindings!
thanks for the explanations, it'd be useful indeed to document what this
magic 0xFF value means.
