Re: [PATCH 00/20] Manual replacement of all strlcpy in favor of strscpy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lun. 22 févr. 2021 à 17:36, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :

>
> Cool. A quick check shows me 1031 strscpy() calls with no return
> checks. All or some of these probably need to be reviewed and add
> return checks. Is this something that is in the plan to address as
> part of this work?
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>

Hi,

Initially, what we planned with Kees is to firstly replace all calls with
error handling codes (like this series does),
and then replace all other simple calls (without error handling). However,
we can also start a discussion about this topic, all suggestions are
welcome.

I am not sure that it does make sense to check all returns code in all
cases (for example in arch/alpha/kernel/setup.c, there are a ton of other
examples in the kernel). But a general review (as you suggest), would make
sense.

Regards,
Romain




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux