Hi, On 2/4/21 11:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> On 1/20/21 10:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Here is v4 of my series to add support for Intel Bay Trail based devices >>> which use a WM5102 codec for audio output/input. >>> >>> This was developed and tested on a Lenovo Yoga Tablet 1051L. >>> >>> The MFD and ASoC parts do not have any build-time dependencies >>> on each other. But the follow-up jack-detect series does have >>> patches depending on each-other and on this series. So IMHO it >>> would be best if this entire series would be merged through the >>> MFD tree to make merging the follow-up series easier. >>> >>> Mark, if that is ok with you (and you are happy with the ASoC >>> changes) can you please Ack this ? >> >> I believe that this series and the follow-up: >> >> "[PATCH v4 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support" >> >> series are both ready for merging. All patches have Reviewed-by and/or >> Acked-by tags now. > > I don't think they do. You're missing ASoC and Extcon Acks. Right, what I meant is that the patches have been reviewed by other stake-holders, including the follow-up series being tested by the cirrus codec folks (thank you Charles). But yes the actual subsys maintainers have not acked these yet; and I'm aware that you will need those for merging this through the MFD tree. Note that this series only requires Mark ack, the follow-up also touches extcon code, this one is purely MFD + ASoC patches. > Not sure why *this* set fell through the cracks though. However, it's > now on my to-review list. > > If I can work fast enough, maybe this series can get into 5.12, but > the follow-up still needs reviews. > > It might be best to collect the *-bys you do have and [RESEND]. Ok, will do. >> I guess it is too late for 5.12, but it would be nice to at least formulate >> a plan for getting this merged after 5.12-rc1 is out. Given the >> interdependencies I still believe that it is best to merge all the patches >> through the mfd tree and then have Lee provide an immutable branch for the >> other subsystems to merge. > > Yes, that's fine. > >> Mark and extcon-maintainers (for the follow-up series) may we have your ack >> for merging these through the MFD tree ? > > Ah, you noticed that too! Ack :) Regards, Hans
