Hi,
On 1/18/21 2:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:13:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> More in general I'm not aware of any (recent-ish) x86 GPIO controllers
>> not being able to do active low interrupts. In theory we could hit this
>> code path on ARM devices using ACPI enumeration, but I don't think it
>> is likely we will see a combination of ARM + ACPI enumeration +
>> WM5102 + GPIO controller not capable of active-low interrupts.
>
> I've not seen this issue on any ARM based systems.
>
>> This overriding of the flags definitely is necessary on the Lenovo
>> devices in question. I could add a
>> "if (dmi_name_in_vendors("LENOVO"))" guard around it, but that
>> seems unnecessary.
>
> Possibly just an update to the comment to make it clear that some
> firmwares might legitimately set the flag?
Ok, I've extended the comment above the override of the irq-flags with
the following paragraph for v4 of this patch-set:
* Note theoretically it is possible that some boards are not capable
* of handling active low level interrupts. In that case setting the
* flag to IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING would not be a bug (and we would need
* to work around this) but sofar all known usages of IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING
* are a bug in the boards DSDT.
Regards,
Hans
