The "dai_id" given into LPAIF_INTFDMA_REG(...) is already the real DAI ID, not an index into v->dai_driver. Looking it up again seems entirely redundant. Cc: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- sound/soc/qcom/lpass-lpaif-reg.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-lpaif-reg.h b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-lpaif-reg.h index 332f1b9ba674..583ca53836a5 100644 --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-lpaif-reg.h +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-lpaif-reg.h @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ #define LPAIF_WRDMAPERCNT_REG(v, chan) LPAIF_WRDMA_REG_ADDR(v, 0x14, (chan)) #define LPAIF_INTFDMA_REG(v, chan, reg, dai_id) \ - ((v->dai_driver[dai_id].id == v->hdmi_dai) ? \ + ((dai_id == v->hdmi_dai) ? \ LPAIF_HDMI_RDMA##reg##_REG(v, chan) : \ LPAIF_RDMA##reg##_REG(v, chan)) -- 2.30.0
