> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:20:36AM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
>
> > static void ak4458_power_off(struct ak4458_priv *ak4458) {
> > - if (ak4458->reset_gpiod) {
> > - gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ak4458->reset_gpiod, 0);
> > - usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > + if (ak4458->reset) {
> > + reset_control_assert(ak4458->reset);
> > + msleep(20);
>
> We should really leave the support for doing this via GPIO in place for backwards
> compatibility I think, we could mark it as deprecated in the binding document.
> Otherwise this makes sense to me and solves a real problem we have with the
> handling of resets so we should look into doing this for new bindings.
>
> One thing I'm not clear on is if there's some way to ensure that we don't have
> different instances of the device resetting each other without them noticing?
> Shouldn't be an issue in practice for the use here.
The way to ensure that we don't have different instances of the device resetting each
other is to rely on the way the "shared" reset is handled by reset API:
==========
+ ak4458->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared(ak4458->dev, NULL);
+ if (IS_ERR(ak4458->reset))
+ return PTR_ERR(ak4458->reset);
==========
/Viorel
