On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:12:41 +0100,
Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> The spin_lock/unlock_irq() functions cannot be nested. The problem is
> that presumably we would want the IRQs to be re-enabled on the second
> call the spin_unlock_irq() but instead it will be enabled at the first
> call so IRQs will be enabled earlier than expected.
>
> In this situation the copy_resp_to_buf() function is only called from
> one function and it is called with IRQs disabled. We can just use
> the regular spin_lock/unlock() functions.
>
> Fixes: 555e8a8f7f14 ("ALSA: fireworks: Add command/response functionality into hwdep interface")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Thanks, applied now with Cc to stable.
Takashi
