On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 10:51:03AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > +static irqreturn_t fsl_aud2htx_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > +{
> > > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >
> > Empty isr? Perhaps can drop the request_irq() at all?
>
> I'd like to keep this for future enhancement, what do you think?
I believe that usually it will be a common practice that we add
when we use it -- exaggerating the situation, just like you will
not actually add an empty driver for future enhancement.
But I am not strongly against it, as it's small. Since Mark has
applied it, let's keep it then.
