On Jan 16, 2008 9:54 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > It's a good question whether the setup should be the codec (driver) > dependent or generic. I tend to believe that we'll need some > codec-specific workarounds, at least, to keep the same level of the > driver support as now. > > In my earler development, I implemented some byte-code implementer in > the driver so that it can be handled in a generic way. The current > codec specific implementation is interpreted to a byte-code in the > user-space tool, and it runs on the driver. Of course, this method > adds an interpreter to the driver, and I'm also not sure whether this > method is optimal. I'll have a look at the current hda-tools and see how it works before emmiting any opinion, I am aware that the codec configuration is more complicated than it looks. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
